Fitness website speed rankings: Week 45, 2026
Compare Fitness product websites using finalized mobile PageSpeed lab measurements for November 2, 2026–November 8, 2026. This weekly archive preserves the recorded scores, loading metrics and measurement methodology.
Finalized measurement week · Week 45, 2026– UTC
- Measured products
- 13eligible in this edition
- Average score
- 88visible leaderboard
- Lowest load time
- 518 mslower is faster
- Week ended
- Nov 8, 2026Sunday, UTC
Filter the board
Compare products in one category using the same weekly evidence.
This board compares website performance. The directory page is the place to discover every Fitness product and its features.
Explore all Fitness productsMobile lab performance
2026-W45 final standings
Two Google PageSpeed lab runs are averaged for each site. Paid plans and Sponsored placements never change rank.
2026-W45 · mobile
Updated
This finalized board ranks 13 products for 2026-W45. MatSync finished first with a Performance Score of 100.
- #0110
MatSync
Fitness- Load time
- 671 ms
- LCP
- 1.06 s
- CLS
- 0.006
- TTFB
- 4 ms
- TBT
- 27 ms
Performance100 - #021
Healthy Calculator Hub
Fitness- Load time
- 637 ms
- LCP
- 948 ms
- CLS
- 0.000
- TTFB
- 4 ms
- TBT
- 199 ms
Performance97 - #033
TreadmillPace
Fitness- Load time
- 872 ms
- LCP
- 1.66 s
- CLS
- 0.000
- TTFB
- 1 ms
- TBT
- 0 ms
Performance97 - #042
ZeroPhase
Fitness- Load time
- 2.06 s
- LCP
- 931 ms
- CLS
- 0.000
- TTFB
- 105 ms
- TBT
- 0 ms
Performance97 - #057
SayLift
Fitness- Load time
- 694 ms
- LCP
- 1.68 s
- CLS
- 0.001
- TTFB
- 5 ms
- TBT
- 48 ms
Performance96 - #063
InjuryLog
Fitness- Load time
- 1.51 s
- LCP
- 3.15 s
- CLS
- 0.001
- TTFB
- 103 ms
- TBT
- 0 ms
Performance93 - #072
CellFit
Fitness- Load time
- 3.34 s
- LCP
- 1.22 s
- CLS
- 0.091
- TTFB
- 1 ms
- TBT
- 0 ms
Performance93 - #08Held
WeedyStoner
Fitness- Load time
- 3.79 s
- LCP
- 2.12 s
- CLS
- 0.091
- TTFB
- 378 ms
- TBT
- 16 ms
Performance90 - #095
PepLedger – Peptide Tracker
Fitness- Load time
- 780 ms
- LCP
- 3.22 s
- CLS
- 0.000
- TTFB
- 2 ms
- TBT
- 115 ms
Performance89 - #103
Catalyst Healthspan Tools
Fitness- Load time
- 950 ms
- LCP
- 1.05 s
- CLS
- 0.000
- TTFB
- 133 ms
- TBT
- 531 ms
Performance88 - #112
Allez - HIIT Interval Timer
Fitness- Load time
- 518 ms
- LCP
- 5.14 s
- CLS
- 0.000
- TTFB
- 1 ms
- TBT
- 0 ms
Performance78 - #122
CarveForm
Fitness- Load time
- 1.09 s
- LCP
- 5.70 s
- CLS
- 0.020
- TTFB
- 1 ms
- TBT
- 121 ms
Performance78 - #13Held
BioStacks
Fitness- Load time
- 892 ms
- LCP
- 13.70 s
- CLS
- 0.000
- TTFB
- 4 ms
- TBT
- 492 ms
Performance52
How IndieTools Speed ranking works
Each eligible product receives two controlled Google PageSpeed mobile lab runs. The complete pair is averaged; failed or partial runs never receive a placeholder score.
Performance Score ranks first. Ties are resolved by load time, LCP, CLS, TTFB and a stable identity key, in that order. Paid plans and Sponsored placements never affect rank.
Rankings refresh each ISO week from Monday 00:00 UTC. Finalized weekly results and awards remain permanently attached to their original evidence.
Methodology psi-mobile-two-sample-mean-v1 · ranking speed-ranking-v1