Skip to content

Fitness website speed rankings: Week 45, 2026

Compare Fitness product websites using finalized mobile PageSpeed lab measurements for November 2, 2026–November 8, 2026. This weekly archive preserves the recorded scores, loading metrics and measurement methodology.

Finalized measurement week · Week 45, 2026– UTC

Measured products
13eligible in this edition
Average score
88visible leaderboard
Lowest load time
518 mslower is faster
Week ended
Nov 8, 2026Sunday, UTC

Filter the board

Compare products in one category using the same weekly evidence.

Clear Fitness

This board compares website performance. The directory page is the place to discover every Fitness product and its features.

Explore all Fitness products

Mobile lab performance

2026-W45 final standings

Two Google PageSpeed lab runs are averaged for each site. Paid plans and Sponsored placements never change rank.

2026-W45 · mobile
Updated

This finalized board ranks 13 products for 2026-W45. MatSync finished first with a Performance Score of 100.

  1. #01
    10

    MatSync

    Fitness
    Load time
    671 ms
    LCP
    1.06 s
    CLS
    0.006
    TTFB
    4 ms
    TBT
    27 ms
    Performance100
  2. #02
    1
    Load time
    637 ms
    LCP
    948 ms
    CLS
    0.000
    TTFB
    4 ms
    TBT
    199 ms
    Performance97
  3. #03
    3
    Load time
    872 ms
    LCP
    1.66 s
    CLS
    0.000
    TTFB
    1 ms
    TBT
    0 ms
    Performance97
  4. #04
    2

    ZeroPhase

    Fitness
    Load time
    2.06 s
    LCP
    931 ms
    CLS
    0.000
    TTFB
    105 ms
    TBT
    0 ms
    Performance97
  5. #05
    7

    SayLift

    Fitness
    Load time
    694 ms
    LCP
    1.68 s
    CLS
    0.001
    TTFB
    5 ms
    TBT
    48 ms
    Performance96
  6. #06
    3

    InjuryLog

    Fitness
    Load time
    1.51 s
    LCP
    3.15 s
    CLS
    0.001
    TTFB
    103 ms
    TBT
    0 ms
    Performance93
  7. #07
    2

    CellFit

    Fitness
    Load time
    3.34 s
    LCP
    1.22 s
    CLS
    0.091
    TTFB
    1 ms
    TBT
    0 ms
    Performance93
  8. #08
    Held
    Load time
    3.79 s
    LCP
    2.12 s
    CLS
    0.091
    TTFB
    378 ms
    TBT
    16 ms
    Performance90
  9. #09
    5
    Load time
    780 ms
    LCP
    3.22 s
    CLS
    0.000
    TTFB
    2 ms
    TBT
    115 ms
    Performance89
  10. #10
    3
    Load time
    950 ms
    LCP
    1.05 s
    CLS
    0.000
    TTFB
    133 ms
    TBT
    531 ms
    Performance88
  11. #11
    2
    Load time
    518 ms
    LCP
    5.14 s
    CLS
    0.000
    TTFB
    1 ms
    TBT
    0 ms
    Performance78
  12. #12
    2

    CarveForm

    Fitness
    Load time
    1.09 s
    LCP
    5.70 s
    CLS
    0.020
    TTFB
    1 ms
    TBT
    121 ms
    Performance78
  13. #13
    Held

    BioStacks

    Fitness
    Load time
    892 ms
    LCP
    13.70 s
    CLS
    0.000
    TTFB
    4 ms
    TBT
    492 ms
    Performance52
How IndieTools Speed ranking works

Each eligible product receives two controlled Google PageSpeed mobile lab runs. The complete pair is averaged; failed or partial runs never receive a placeholder score.

Performance Score ranks first. Ties are resolved by load time, LCP, CLS, TTFB and a stable identity key, in that order. Paid plans and Sponsored placements never affect rank.

Rankings refresh each ISO week from Monday 00:00 UTC. Finalized weekly results and awards remain permanently attached to their original evidence.

Methodology psi-mobile-two-sample-mean-v1 · ranking speed-ranking-v1