Fitness website speed rankings: Week 43, 2026
Compare Fitness product websites using finalized mobile PageSpeed lab measurements for October 19, 2026–October 25, 2026. This weekly archive preserves the recorded scores, loading metrics and measurement methodology.
Finalized measurement week · Week 43, 2026– UTC
- Measured products
- 12eligible in this edition
- Average score
- 78visible leaderboard
- Lowest load time
- 617 mslower is faster
- Week ended
- Oct 25, 2026Sunday, UTC
Filter the board
Compare products in one category using the same weekly evidence.
This board compares website performance. The directory page is the place to discover every Fitness product and its features.
Explore all Fitness productsMobile lab performance
2026-W43 final standings
Two Google PageSpeed lab runs are averaged for each site. Paid plans and Sponsored placements never change rank.
2026-W43 · mobile
Updated
This finalized board ranks 12 products for 2026-W43. Healthy Calculator Hub finished first with a Performance Score of 94.
- #01Held
Healthy Calculator Hub
Fitness- Load time
- 1.31 s
- LCP
- 1.14 s
- CLS
- 0.000
- TTFB
- 3 ms
- TBT
- 287 ms
Performance94 - #02Held
InjuryLog
Fitness- Load time
- 1.78 s
- LCP
- 3.30 s
- CLS
- 0.001
- TTFB
- 90 ms
- TBT
- 0 ms
Performance92 - #032
CellFit
Fitness- Load time
- 3.35 s
- LCP
- 1.06 s
- CLS
- 0.184
- TTFB
- 1 ms
- TBT
- 0 ms
Performance90 - #04Held
ZeroPhase
Fitness- Load time
- 3.18 s
- LCP
- 3.15 s
- CLS
- 0.000
- TTFB
- 91 ms
- TBT
- 15 ms
Performance89 - #052
PepLedger – Peptide Tracker
Fitness- Load time
- 7.75 s
- LCP
- 3.97 s
- CLS
- 0.079
- TTFB
- 2 ms
- TBT
- 32 ms
Performance84 - #06Held
Catalyst Healthspan Tools
Fitness- Load time
- 1.35 s
- LCP
- 3.16 s
- CLS
- 0.000
- TTFB
- 4 ms
- TBT
- 736 ms
Performance75 - #07New
Allez - HIIT Interval Timer
Fitness- Load time
- 617 ms
- LCP
- 5.06 s
- CLS
- 0.000
- TTFB
- 1 ms
- TBT
- 0 ms
Performance73 - #081
CarveForm
Fitness- Load time
- 1.62 s
- LCP
- 5.51 s
- CLS
- 0.003
- TTFB
- 2 ms
- TBT
- 180 ms
Performance71 - #09New
SayLift
Fitness- Load time
- 1.15 s
- LCP
- 5.48 s
- CLS
- 0.000
- TTFB
- 5 ms
- TBT
- 84 ms
Performance70 - #102
WeedyStoner
Fitness- Load time
- 3.16 s
- LCP
- 4.21 s
- CLS
- 0.153
- TTFB
- 376 ms
- TBT
- 38 ms
Performance70 - #112
MatSync
Fitness- Load time
- 883 ms
- LCP
- 5.86 s
- CLS
- 0.000
- TTFB
- 4 ms
- TBT
- 10 ms
Performance67 - #122
BioStacks
Fitness- Load time
- 726 ms
- LCP
- 15.05 s
- CLS
- 0.000
- TTFB
- 3 ms
- TBT
- 486 ms
Performance56
How IndieTools Speed ranking works
Each eligible product receives two controlled Google PageSpeed mobile lab runs. The complete pair is averaged; failed or partial runs never receive a placeholder score.
Performance Score ranks first. Ties are resolved by load time, LCP, CLS, TTFB and a stable identity key, in that order. Paid plans and Sponsored placements never affect rank.
Rankings refresh each ISO week from Monday 00:00 UTC. Finalized weekly results and awards remain permanently attached to their original evidence.
Methodology psi-mobile-two-sample-mean-v1 · ranking speed-ranking-v1