Fitness website speed rankings: Week 44, 2026
Compare Fitness product websites using finalized mobile PageSpeed lab measurements for October 26, 2026–November 1, 2026. This weekly archive preserves the recorded scores, loading metrics and measurement methodology.
Finalized measurement week · Week 44, 2026– UTC
- Measured products
- 13eligible in this edition
- Average score
- 78visible leaderboard
- Lowest load time
- 447 mslower is faster
- Week ended
- Nov 1, 2026Sunday, UTC
Filter the board
Compare products in one category using the same weekly evidence.
This board compares website performance. The directory page is the place to discover every Fitness product and its features.
Explore all Fitness productsMobile lab performance
2026-W44 final standings
Two Google PageSpeed lab runs are averaged for each site. Paid plans and Sponsored placements never change rank.
2026-W44 · mobile
Updated
This finalized board ranks 13 products for 2026-W44. Healthy Calculator Hub finished first with a Performance Score of 97.
- #01Held
Healthy Calculator Hub
Fitness- Load time
- 692 ms
- LCP
- 1.80 s
- CLS
- 0.000
- TTFB
- 4 ms
- TBT
- 177 ms
Performance97 - #022
ZeroPhase
Fitness- Load time
- 1.76 s
- LCP
- 3.15 s
- CLS
- 0.000
- TTFB
- 92 ms
- TBT
- 9 ms
Performance93 - #031
InjuryLog
Fitness- Load time
- 1.86 s
- LCP
- 3.16 s
- CLS
- 0.000
- TTFB
- 128 ms
- TBT
- 10 ms
Performance90 - #041
PepLedger – Peptide Tracker
Fitness- Load time
- 747 ms
- LCP
- 3.53 s
- CLS
- 0.000
- TTFB
- 2 ms
- TBT
- 112 ms
Performance89 - #052
CellFit
Fitness- Load time
- 3.90 s
- LCP
- 1.37 s
- CLS
- 0.182
- TTFB
- 1 ms
- TBT
- 0 ms
Performance89 - #06New
TreadmillPace
Fitness- Load time
- 466 ms
- LCP
- 2.74 s
- CLS
- 0.118
- TTFB
- 2 ms
- TBT
- 0 ms
Performance88 - #071
Catalyst Healthspan Tools
Fitness- Load time
- 1.71 s
- LCP
- 3.16 s
- CLS
- 0.000
- TTFB
- 848 ms
- TBT
- 445 ms
Performance81 - #082
WeedyStoner
Fitness- Load time
- 3.17 s
- LCP
- 4.20 s
- CLS
- 0.091
- TTFB
- 374 ms
- TBT
- 17 ms
Performance75 - #092
Allez - HIIT Interval Timer
Fitness- Load time
- 447 ms
- LCP
- 5.41 s
- CLS
- 0.000
- TTFB
- 2 ms
- TBT
- 0 ms
Performance72 - #102
CarveForm
Fitness- Load time
- 1.61 s
- LCP
- 5.65 s
- CLS
- 0.000
- TTFB
- 2 ms
- TBT
- 150 ms
Performance72 - #11Held
MatSync
Fitness- Load time
- 2.07 s
- LCP
- 6.00 s
- CLS
- 0.000
- TTFB
- 4 ms
- TBT
- 20 ms
Performance67 - #123
SayLift
Fitness- Load time
- 585 ms
- LCP
- 5.93 s
- CLS
- 0.001
- TTFB
- 7 ms
- TBT
- 190 ms
Performance66 - #131
BioStacks
Fitness- Load time
- 2.91 s
- LCP
- 14.82 s
- CLS
- 0.067
- TTFB
- 5 ms
- TBT
- 15.37 s
Performance34
How IndieTools Speed ranking works
Each eligible product receives two controlled Google PageSpeed mobile lab runs. The complete pair is averaged; failed or partial runs never receive a placeholder score.
Performance Score ranks first. Ties are resolved by load time, LCP, CLS, TTFB and a stable identity key, in that order. Paid plans and Sponsored placements never affect rank.
Rankings refresh each ISO week from Monday 00:00 UTC. Finalized weekly results and awards remain permanently attached to their original evidence.
Methodology psi-mobile-two-sample-mean-v1 · ranking speed-ranking-v1