An AI storyboard review handoff should identify what each shot is meant to communicate and which exact version is approved. A board full of attractive alternatives is not yet a production decision. The next person needs to know what to use, what still requires work and where the source references came from.
This proposed workflow uses LetzAI, available through the Luxembourg product catalogue, as a creative-suite example. No images were generated or client approvals obtained for this article.
Write the purpose of each shot
Start with a short sequence and give every shot one job. A frame might establish the setting, demonstrate a product action or show the result. Write that purpose before generating visual alternatives.
Add the constraints that matter to the sequence: subject identity, product appearance, framing and intended output format. Keep the brief compact enough that a reviewer can compare each candidate with it directly.
Prepare authorized references
Use reference materials you have permission to upload and use for the intended production. Keep their source and relevant restrictions in the project notes.
Review the current service and model terms before including confidential client material. Do not treat a generated variation as a way to avoid unresolved rights in its input. The workflow does not certify copyright ownership or commercial clearance.
Keep candidates tied to specific revisions
Label each candidate by shot and revision. Record the intended change from the previous version, such as a clearer product angle or a simpler background.
Avoid replacing a candidate silently while reviewers are discussing it. Their feedback should point to a stable version, even if a newer version is already being explored. This prevents an approval from accidentally applying to a different visual.
Review meaning before polish
Ask first whether the shot communicates its intended purpose. Then inspect the details: product shape, text, hands or other anatomy where relevant, visual continuity and distracting artifacts.
For a sequence, place the candidates together and check how they connect. Individually strong images may imply different settings or inconsistent subjects. Keep those differences visible instead of assuming that a shared prompt guarantees continuity.
Turn comments into decisions
Separate observations from instructions. “The product is hard to distinguish from the background” explains a problem; “increase the subject separation” proposes a revision. Record who can approve the result and which constraints remain mandatory.
LetzAI's official site describes shared creative work and review features. Verify the exact permissions and review controls available in your chosen plan. A collaboration feature does not by itself define your team's approval policy.
Package the approved sequence
Export the approved assets in the format required by the next production step. Check the files themselves for dimensions, completeness and correspondence with the approved versions.
Include the shot list, revision identifiers and unresolved limitations in the handoff. If an image is only a concept reference, label it accordingly rather than presenting it as a finished production asset.
The creative-suite evaluation guide explains the selection criteria behind this routine. The useful deliverable is a small, understandable package with one authoritative approved version, not an unexplained folder of every generated option.
archmaster
Snapkin