Revdoku gives AI agents unique inbound email addresses backed by secure cloud buckets. Emails are stored as original EML, decoded JSON and Markdown with attachments, and agents can access them through an AI skill, hosted MCP, CLI, API or web app. Bucket permissions, versions, read tracking, logs and locks support auditable multi-agent workflows.
Who it is for
Teams and developers building autonomous AI agents and multi-agent workflows.
Problem it solves
AI agents need a reliable way to receive emails, verification codes, documents and attachments without relying on a human inbox.
The solution
Revdoku gives each agent a unique inbound email address backed by a secure cloud bucket, with access through an AI skill, hosted MCP, CLI, API or web app.
What makes it unique
It preserves incoming messages as original EML plus decoded JSON and Markdown with attachments, alongside bucket permissions, versioning, read tracking, logs and locks.
Features1 listed
AI agent inboxes
Give every AI agent a unique inbound email address with stored messages and attachments.
Details
Platforms
Web
·API
·CLI
Pricing
Freemium
Built for
Teams and developers building autonomous AI agents and multi-agent workflows.
In IndieTools' mobile lab test on November 12, 2026, the Revdoku website scored 98 out of 100 (good). Largest Contentful Paint took 1.80 s, rated good. It placed #472 overall in the finalized week 2026-W45.
Measured (UTC)
LCPLargest Contentful Paint
1.80 s
Good
TBTTotal Blocking Time
0 ms
Good
CLSCumulative Layout Shift
0.059
Good
FCPFirst Contentful Paint
1.80 s
Needs improvement
Ranked #472 overall in 2026-W45, best #216.
Revdoku lab metrics
Speed metrics for Revdoku, measured November 12, 2026
Metric
Result
Status
Trend
Mobile lab testMid-range phone on a throttled 4G connection, two runs averaged. Changes compare with the run on Nov 11.
Performance score
GoodUp 1 points
98 / 100
GoodUp 1 points
First Contentful PaintFCP
Needs improvement150 ms slower
1.80 s
Needs improvement150 ms slower
Largest Contentful PaintLCP
Good451 ms faster
1.80 s
Good451 ms faster
Speed IndexSI
Good989 ms slower
2.64 s
Good989 ms slower
Total Blocking TimeTBT
GoodAbout the same
0 ms
GoodAbout the same
Cumulative Layout ShiftCLS
Good0.029 more shift
0.059
Good0.029 more shift
Unthrottled observationsTimed on the test machine's own fast connection, so they read lower than the lab metrics above.
Page loadLoad
22 ms slower
484 ms
22 ms slower
Server responseTTFB
About the same
8 ms
About the same
Revdoku performance history
55 comparable mobile lab runs since September 27, 2026. Choose a metric and a range, then move along the line to read each run.
Revdoku Speed ranking
Weekly Speed standing for Revdoku
Weekly standingLatest finalized week 2026-W45. Bests cover the last 52 finalized weeks.
Stored lab observations from controlled test runs, not real-user Core Web Vitals or a guarantee of search rankings. Weekly standings remain attached to their finalized edition.Method psi-mobile-two-sample-mean-v1, 2 samples per reading. Lab results can vary between runs.
Model difference−6. DR4 is 6 points lower than DR3.
Measured · revdoku.com
What do DR4, DR3 and the model difference mean?
DR4:
Ahrefs' newer model. It gives more weight to links from sites with organic search traffic and rates a subdomain on its own links.
DR3:
The previous model, shown in the Ahrefs app until 1 December 2026.
Model difference:
DR4 minus DR3 for the same domain. The models calculate differently, so this is not growth or a drop; the “since” lines compare each model with itself.
Screenshot API for agencies and developers: send a URL, get a real Chrome capture back as PNG, JPEG, WebP or PDF, with scheduled captures and a hosted MCP server
