AIOverview.com is a product of TBR (TheBestReputation) — a digital marketing and reputation management agency ranked No. 201 on the Inc. 5000 and recognized among the top 4% of fastest-growing companies nationwide. When AI search exploded, our team recognized a critical gap: businesses had no way to measure or improve their visibility in AI-generated results. So we built the tool ourselves.
Who it is for
Brands and marketing teams measuring how they appear across major AI search engines.
Problem it solves
Businesses lack a consistent view of how answer engines rank, describe and recommend their brand.
The solution
AIOverview measures, tracks and helps improve brand visibility across Google AI Overviews, ChatGPT, Gemini, Perplexity and Claude.
What makes it unique
The platform evaluates a broad set of AI-visibility ranking factors across several answer engines from one report.
Features6 listed
AI Search Visibility Score
Get a 1–50 score measuring how well your brand shows up across ChatGPT, Gemini, Perplexity, Claude, and Google AI Overviews.
Competitor Benchmarking
See how you stack up against competitors in AI search results with side-by-side comparison dashboards.
Brand Sentiment Tracking
Monitor what AI engines actually say about your brand — positive, negative, or neutral — in real time.
Keyword Rankings in AI
Track which keywords trigger your brand in AI-generated answers and where you rank for each.
Multi-Engine Coverage
One scan covers Google AI Overviews, ChatGPT, Gemini, Perplexity, and Claude — all in one dashboard.
Score History & Trends
Watch your visibility improve over time with weekly snapshots, trend charts, and progress tracking.
Details
Built for
Brands and marketing teams measuring how they appear across major AI search engines.
In IndieTools' mobile lab test on November 12, 2026, the AIOverview by TBR website scored 74 out of 100 (needs improvement). Largest Contentful Paint took 6.07 s, rated poor. It placed #1101 overall in the finalized week 2026-W45.
Measured (UTC)
LCPLargest Contentful Paint
6.07 s
Poor
TBTTotal Blocking Time
8 ms
Good
CLSCumulative Layout Shift
0.000
Good
FCPFirst Contentful Paint
1.42 s
Good
Ranked #1101 overall in 2026-W45, best #25.
AIOverview by TBR lab metrics
Speed metrics for AIOverview by TBR, measured November 12, 2026
Metric
Result
Status
Trend
Mobile lab testMid-range phone on a throttled 4G connection, two runs averaged. Changes compare with the run on Nov 11.
Performance score
Needs improvementDown 3 points
74 / 100
Needs improvementDown 3 points
First Contentful PaintFCP
Good76 ms slower
1.42 s
Good76 ms slower
Largest Contentful PaintLCP
Poor899 ms slower
6.07 s
Poor899 ms slower
Speed IndexSI
Needs improvementAbout the same
5.21 s
Needs improvementAbout the same
Total Blocking TimeTBT
GoodAbout the same
8 ms
GoodAbout the same
Cumulative Layout ShiftCLS
GoodAbout the same
0.000
GoodAbout the same
Unthrottled observationsTimed on the test machine's own fast connection, so they read lower than the lab metrics above.
Page loadLoad
About the same
3.54 s
About the same
Server responseTTFB
About the same
5 ms
About the same
AIOverview by TBR performance history
55 comparable mobile lab runs since September 27, 2026. Choose a metric and a range, then move along the line to read each run.
AIOverview by TBR Speed ranking
Weekly Speed standing for AIOverview by TBR
Weekly standingLatest finalized week 2026-W45. Bests cover the last 52 finalized weeks.
Stored lab observations from controlled test runs, not real-user Core Web Vitals or a guarantee of search rankings. Weekly standings remain attached to their finalized edition.Method psi-mobile-two-sample-mean-v1, 2 samples per reading. Lab results can vary between runs.
Model difference−14. DR4 is 14 points lower than DR3.
Measured · thebestreputation.com
What do DR4, DR3 and the model difference mean?
DR4:
Ahrefs' newer model. It gives more weight to links from sites with organic search traffic and rates a subdomain on its own links.
DR3:
The previous model, shown in the Ahrefs app until 1 December 2026.
Model difference:
DR4 minus DR3 for the same domain. The models calculate differently, so this is not growth or a drop; the “since” lines compare each model with itself.
