AI video ads, UGC-style videos, and product visuals for cross-border sellers and e-commerce brands.
MenuCapture
MenuCapture — AI menu photo editor: upload your dish photo, type the change, done in about 15 seconds
About MenuCapture
Upload a photo of your dish, type what you want changed, and get an edited menu photo in about 15 seconds. The dish in the photo stays the same. Every edit is saved as a new version, so you can step back to any earlier one and your original is never touched. You can swap ingredients, change backgrounds and surfaces, fix lighting and color, batch up to 10 photos at once, and export each photo at the sizes DoorDash, Uber Eats, Grubhub and Instagram ask for. Edited photos can go on a free hosted web menu with its own link and QR code. Agencies and web designers can edit client photos from one dashboard or use the API.
- Who it is for
- Restaurant owners and chefs who need menu photos for delivery apps, websites and printed menus, and agencies that edit photos for restaurant clients.
- Problem it solves
- Traditional food photography requires days to weeks of scheduling per menu shoot, studio setup and equipment coordination, and results take 2-7 days to receive. Menu updates require a new photo shoot.
- The solution
- Upload a photo of your dish, type the change you want, and download the edited photo in about 15 seconds, with no scheduling or studio needed.
- What makes it unique
- It edits the photo of your actual dish instead of generating food from scratch, and every edit is saved as a new version, so the original is never touched.
Features
AI-powered photo editing
Batch processing
Text prompt editing
Professional food styling
Instant results
Multiple export formats
Details
- Platforms
- Web
- Pricing
- Paid
- Built for
Restaurant owners and chefs who need menu photos for delivery apps, websites and printed menus, and agencies that edit photos for restaurant clients.
- Building since
2025
Technology
MenuCapture screenshot showing a burger with a menu in the background
1 / 1Website performance
Recorded mobile lab measurements and finalized weekly standings from IndieTools Speed.
MenuCapture website speed overview
76
Performance scoreNeeds improvement
In IndieTools' mobile lab test on November 11, 2026, the MenuCapture website scored 76 out of 100 (needs improvement). Largest Contentful Paint took 5.99 s, rated poor.
Measured (UTC)
- LCPLargest Contentful Paint
- 5.99 s
- Poor
- TBTTotal Blocking Time
- 35 ms
- Good
- CLSCumulative Layout Shift
- 0.000
- Good
- FCPFirst Contentful Paint
- 910 ms
- Good
Not ranked in a finalized week yet.
MenuCapture lab metrics
| Metric | Result | Status | Trend |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mobile lab testMid-range phone on a throttled 4G connection, two runs averaged. Changes compare with the run on Nov 11. | |||
| Performance score Needs improvementUp 1 points | 76 / 100 | Needs improvementUp 1 points | |
| First Contentful Paint GoodAbout the same | 910 ms | GoodAbout the same | |
| Largest Contentful Paint PoorAbout the same | 5.99 s | PoorAbout the same | |
| Speed Index Needs improvement1.02 s faster | 4.18 s | Needs improvement1.02 s faster | |
| Total Blocking Time Good15 ms faster | 35 ms | Good15 ms faster | |
| Cumulative Layout Shift GoodAbout the same | 0.000 | GoodAbout the same | |
| Unthrottled observationsTimed on the test machine's own fast connection, so they read lower than the lab metrics above. | |||
| Page load 344 ms slower | 2.91 s | 344 ms slower | |
| Server response About the same | 2 ms | About the same | |
MenuCapture performance history
2 comparable mobile lab runs since November 11, 2026. Choose a metric and a range, then move along the line to read each run.
MenuCapture Speed ranking
Not ranked yet. Ranks appear once a week with this product is finalized.
Stored lab observations from controlled test runs, not real-user Core Web Vitals or a guarantee of search rankings. Weekly standings remain attached to their finalized edition.Method psi-mobile-two-sample-mean-v1, 2 samples per reading. Lab results can vary between runs.
Domain Rating
Domain Rating by Ahrefs- DR4 (primary model)
- 4
First DR4 reading
- DR3
- 18
First DR3 reading
Model difference−14. DR4 is 14 points lower than DR3.
Measured · menucapture.com
What do DR4, DR3 and the model difference mean?
- DR4:
- Ahrefs' newer model. It gives more weight to links from sites with organic search traffic and rates a subdomain on its own links.
- DR3:
- The previous model, shown in the Ahrefs app until 1 December 2026.
- Model difference:
- DR4 minus DR3 for the same domain. The models calculate differently, so this is not growth or a drop; the “since” lines compare each model with itself.
Related products
Others in the same categories.
AI image generation, photo editing, and video creation in one workspace
Compress animated GIFs online for free
Object removal and background replacement.
Convert PNG and JPG images to SVG, EPS and DXF in your browser, with no uploads.
Find open-source creative software by workflow, platform and development stage.
