Freemium
Listed on IndieTools
MCPGram vs MCPize
MCPGram and MCPize are publicly listed products on IndieTools. This comparison brings their recorded features, pricing and product information together, alongside stored mobile and desktop website measurements where available so you can check the details that matter to your workflow.
Side-by-side facts · Product order does not indicate a winner
Last updated:
MCPize
MCPize is an MCP marketplace with 1000+ Model Context Protocol servers for Claude, Cursor, and VS Code. Publishers keep 80% of every subscription.
Published listing
Listed on IndieTools
At a glance
Available listing details and recorded measurements. An unavailable value is not a negative result.
| Detail | MCPGram | MCPize |
|---|---|---|
| Categories | ||
| Pricing models |
| Not available |
| Platforms |
| Not available |
| Selected product country | Not available | |
| Declared technologies | Not available | |
| Listed target audience |
|
|
| Ahrefs Domain Rating | Not available |
|
| Mobile performance |
|
|
| Public founders | ||
| Published on IndieTools |
|
|
Key differences
- The recorded mobile performance scores are 53/100 for MCPGram (Oct 9, 2026) and 49/100 for MCPize (Oct 9, 2026), using psi-mobile-two-sample-mean-v1 with 2 samples each. These are separate laboratory observations.
- Recorded feature highlights differ: MCPGram lists Native apps and external MCP servers; MCPize lists MCP server marketplace, Unified credentials, Usage and cost tracking. These are listing highlights, not exhaustive capability inventories; an omitted feature may still be available.
What they have in common
- Both are listed in Developer tools on IndieTools.
Domain Rating
Domain Rating is an Ahrefs backlink-strength metric, not a Google ranking score or a measure of product quality. Public readings must match the current product domain and be no more than 21 days old. History covers recorded readings for that domain; missing history does not mean the rating never changed.
MCPGram
No public Domain Rating measurement is available for MCPGram.
MCPize
43/ 100
mcpize.com
Measured
- Previous measurement
- 43 ·
- Change from previous
- 0 points
- Highest recorded
- 43
- Recorded measurements
- 16
Website performance
Speed values are stored laboratory measurements, not real-user Core Web Vitals. Mobile and desktop runs may have different dates, sample counts and methodologies; compare the same device and method. Missing results are unavailable, not zero, and no overall winner is inferred.
Mobile measurements
MCPGram
53Performance / 100
Measured
2 samples
Method: psi-mobile-two-sample-mean-v1
MCPize
49Performance / 100
Measured
2 samples
Method: psi-mobile-two-sample-mean-v1
| Detail | MCPGram | MCPize |
|---|---|---|
| First Contentful Paint |
|
|
| Largest Contentful Paint |
|
|
| Cumulative Layout Shift |
|
|
| Total Blocking Time |
|
|
| Speed Index |
|
|
| Time to First Byte |
|
|
| Load time |
|
|
Technologies and integrations
These technologies are recorded in the public listings. A technology missing from a listing may still be used by that product.
MCPize
No technologies are recorded in this listing.
What is MCPGram?
MCPGram is an MCP gateway for AI agents. It brings native OAuth apps and external MCP servers into one workspace, with a shared tool catalog and workspace controls for clients such as Claude Code, Cursor and Codex. Developers can connect apps, discover tools and enable or disable sources per workspace. The CLI provides login, synchronization and agent onboarding through one Universal Layer.
Selected listed features
Native apps and external MCP servers
Connect OAuth apps and remote MCP endpoints in one tool catalog.
What is MCPize?
MCPize is the complete platform for MCP servers. It offers a marketplace with 1000+ vetted Model Context Protocol servers that integrate with Claude, Cursor, VS Code, Windsurf, and other AI tools. Every server passes a 7-dimension quality audit covering protocol compliance, OAuth, reliability, and safety. Developers can publish and deploy MCP servers in 30 seconds with GitHub auto-deploy and earn 80% revenue share. Users get one API key for all servers, consolidated billing, and a unified dashboard for usage, costs, and alerts. The free tier includes 25,000 requests per month with no credit card required.
Selected listed features
MCP server marketplace
Unified credentials
Usage and cost tracking
Use cases and audience
Use cases and audiences below reflect the information provided in each product listing.
MCPGram
Developers and teams building AI agents with Claude Code, Cursor, Codex and other clients.
MCPize
Developers building or using AI agents.
- Find MCP servers for an AI workflow
- Monitor MCP server usage and costs
Meet the founders
Explore the publicly listed founder profiles connected to each product.
Choosing for your workflow
- Consider MCPGram if its listed audience, Developers and teams building AI agents with Claude Code, Cursor, Codex and other clients., matches your needs. Validate the relevant features in a trial or demonstration.
- Consider MCPize when evaluating Find MCP servers for an AI workflow, Monitor MCP server usage and costs. These are the use cases listed by the product; test your own workflow before choosing.
- Compare the same billing period, currency, usage limits and required features on each official pricing page before judging total cost.
- Use website measurements to review a measured page and device, then test your own application workflow. A landing-page score does not establish application performance or an overall winner.
Frequently asked questions
- What is the difference between MCPGram and MCPize?
- The recorded mobile performance scores are 53/100 for MCPGram (Oct 9, 2026) and 49/100 for MCPize (Oct 9, 2026), using psi-mobile-two-sample-mean-v1 with 2 samples each. These are separate laboratory observations. Recorded feature highlights differ: MCPGram lists Native apps and external MCP servers; MCPize lists MCP server marketplace, Unified credentials, Usage and cost tracking. These are listing highlights, not exhaustive capability inventories; an omitted feature may still be available.
- Which should I choose: MCPGram or MCPize?
- Consider MCPGram if its listed audience, Developers and teams building AI agents with Claude Code, Cursor, Codex and other clients., matches your needs. Validate the relevant features in a trial or demonstration. Consider MCPize when evaluating Find MCP servers for an AI workflow, Monitor MCP server usage and costs. These are the use cases listed by the product; test your own workflow before choosing.
- How do MCPGram and MCPize compare on pricing?
- MCPGram: Freemium. MCPize: pricing not recorded. These are listed product details, not a verified like-for-like quote. Check billing periods, currency and current limits on the official websites.
- Are these mobile and desktop Speed scores directly comparable?
- Speed values are stored laboratory measurements, not real-user Core Web Vitals. Mobile and desktop runs may have different dates, sample counts and methodologies; compare the same device and method. Missing results are unavailable, not zero, and no overall winner is inferred.
- What does Domain Rating tell me about these products?
- Domain Rating is an Ahrefs backlink-strength metric, not a Google ranking score or a measure of product quality. Public readings must match the current product domain and be no more than 21 days old. History covers recorded readings for that domain; missing history does not mean the rating never changed.
- Which technologies do MCPGram and MCPize list?
- MCPGram lists Next.js. MCPize lists no technology details in its public listing. These are declared technologies, not independently detected infrastructure.
- Who are the founders listed for MCPGram and MCPize?
- MCPGram: Aryan Verma. MCPize: Charlotte Wilson. Only public, accepted founder relationships are included.
- Are MCPGram and MCPize alternatives?
- Their public listings overlap in the categories Developer tools, making them candidates to evaluate together. This overlap does not establish feature parity or interchangeability; check integrations, limits and your required workflow.
- Where do the comparison details come from?
- Product descriptions, pricing, platforms, countries and technologies come from public IndieTools listings and founder-provided details. Domain Rating comes from stored Ahrefs readings; Speed comes from stored measurement records. Last updated reflects the latest recorded listing, feature, measurement or public activity change shown here, not a fresh website audit.
Related product comparisons
Explore other recorded comparisons involving MCPGram or MCPize.
MCPGram vs AI Coding Tools Guide
MCPGram: One MCP gateway for native apps, external MCP servers and AI agents. · AI Coding Tools Guide: Compare and configure Claude Code, Cursor, GitHub Copilot, MCP servers, and other AI coding tools.
Compare productsMCPize vs AI Coding Tools Guide
MCPize: MCPize is an MCP marketplace with 1000+ Model Context Protocol servers for Claude, Cursor, and VS Code. Publishers keep 80% of every subscription. · AI Coding Tools Guide: Compare and configure Claude Code, Cursor, GitHub Copilot, MCP servers, and other AI coding tools.
Compare products
MCPize vs MCPhq
MCPize: MCPize is an MCP marketplace with 1000+ Model Context Protocol servers for Claude, Cursor, and VS Code. Publishers keep 80% of every subscription. · MCPhq: Find the right MCP server
Compare products